Transparency International (NZ) calls for action in two important areas to improve budget transparency

Transparency International (NZ) calls for action in two important areas to improve budget transparency

19 February 2009

While NZ scores highly on budget transparency in an 85-country international study, there are two areas where we fail to meet basic international standards, and the Board of TINZ urges early action to remedy these deficiencies.

The survey, organised by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) in Washington D.C., is based on 123 detailed questions covering all stages of budget preparation and execution. Most of the 85 countries in the sample are developing countries, and New Zealand is rated as one of only five countries that provide extensive information to the public.


However, the NZ survey, conducted by TINZ, identifies two important areas where NZ does not meet international standards.

First, the OBI survey asks whether the executive makes available to the public a report on what steps it has taken to address audit recommendations or findings that indicate a need for remedial action; and also asks whether the National Audit Body or the legislature publishes a report that tracks actions taken by the executive to address audit recommendations. On both of these questions NZ scores a 'D'.

Many countries have formal mechanisms to publicly monitor follow-up action in response to audit findings. The Board of TINZ urges early action to strengthen the functioning of this extremely important watch-dog over potential abuse of the public purse.

Secondly, there is a serious lack of transparency in NZ about tax expenditures - special tax incentives or concessions for favoured activities that result in less tax revenue being levied than would be the case from the application of the normal tax code. While since 2004 there has been a requirement for the cost of any new tax expenditures to be disclosed when they are introduced, the government has not disclosed to the NZ public for decades how many of these provisions there are in the tax code, nor what they might cost the taxpayer each year in foregone revenue. While there are likely to be few tax expenditures at present in NZ, regular publication of information on them is an important principle of accountability, and is the practice in many OECD countries. Regular disclosure would also help to ensure they are not used in future to channel public resources to politically favoured groups in a way that escapes full public scrutiny.

Contact for additional comment: Murray Petrie, 021 150 3475

Download the full media release

Actions

Recent Activity

Protect our whistleblowers
Transparency International New Zealand (TINZ) is calls for better whistleblower protection. 8 Aug, 2017

Auditor General resignation requires transparency
Transparency International New Zealand (TINZ) calls on Parliament to release the report by Sir Maarten Wevers that lead to the resignation of Auditor-General Martin Matthews. 5 Aug, 2017

TINZ applauds decline in foreign trusts
Government implementation of tougher disclosure requirements for foreign trusts have led to around 75% discontinuing or exiting New Zealand. 9 Jul, 2017

Public Sector Integrity Media Release
State Services Commission took a very positive step in addressing a key recommendation of TINZ's Integrity Plus 2013 New Zealand National Integrity System Assessment by advertising a role for Deputy Commissioner, Integrity, Ethics and Standards. 11 May, 2017

Corruption Perceptions Index 2016 TINZ media release
Transparency International 25 Jan, 2017