From Panama’s cabals at the canal to smurfing in NZ

By Ferdinand Balfoort, from Northumbria

Some of us may have encountered some odd groups of Smurfs walking by in Auckland lately. Those sufficiently alert among us may have also noted the bulging briefcases they carried. The long-term impact of their activities in our Land of the Long White Cloud may in future include us collectively paying our rent to, well, Smurfs. Don’t complain that we didn’t tell you. But we should start at the beginning, taking us back four years and another continent.

Smurf less briefcase. They are not good news unless they are stationary and provide a perch for the birds in your garden. Note the appropriate whiteness of hat to allow bird guano to blend in. (

The Central Bureau of Investigations in India is not an agency to be trifled with. Think dark glasses and guys (or gals) speaking surreptitiously in microphones in pursuit of the black money trails around the world. After a brief interlude at the banks of the Panama Canal, CBI Director A P Singh decided to release a public statement about what had been bothering him for a while. According to our intrepid Director, 53 percent of the countries said to be least corrupt on the Corruptions Perception Index are in fact offshore tax havens. Even crooks want some security I guess.

No point parking your funds in Nigeria, because we all know what happens then. Accordingly, New Zealand features in the top five preferred destinations for Indian hot money, amounting to a part of US$ 500 Billion (and everyone else’s, not surprisingly.) Black money: Indians have stashed over $500bn in banks abroad, says CB

Singh’s comments bounced around the world, were quoted in various media publications for a brief while, and then fizzled out like a flaming star in a body of water. It could well have been the Panama Canal. I happen to have a good memory and I can remember tending to the roses when the news came over the radio. This is why I have linked these distant events for the benefit of our readers, to provide a perspective in time. I hasten to add that my historical review does not attempt to shift time back, as Ramon Fonseca allegedly did, on a sliding scale. The US$ 8.75 his firm charged for each month of backdating legal documents for clients just doesn’t interest me. Considering the millions he saved his clientele I would have wanted a percentage of the inflated cake. Just kidding.

Ramon Fonseca – Once compared his company to a car factory on Panama TV. Cars and time-shifting were in the DNA of his Panamaniac firm of dodgy advisors. (Courtesy

My immediate thought on reading about the latest Pananamania was to silently congratulate whoever leaked the information that allowed the report to be produced by the ICIJ. My next thought was basically “so what”. Have we not known about this long back? As I noted, the CBI was already ringing the alarm bells in 2012, and nothing has happened. Transparency International published our report titled Integrity Plus 2013 New Zealand National Integrity System Assessment in 2013, and nothing happened.

In fact, because nothing happened, matters are getting worse over time, and well, a bit backwards I suppose. In our fair country the impact is most obviously felt in property prices. These are being pushed out of our reach by foreign buyers, willing to secure their ticket to paradise, and out of reach of their national tax and other agencies (or their divorce proceedings). Stratfor notes, in their contribution to the Panama debate, “The average citizen usually lacks the motive and the resources to make use of such facilities.” Panama Papers: A Rude Awakening for the World's Wealthy

Equally, the average and increasingly poor New Zealanders lack the motive and energy to focus on this critical issue. I hope this article contributes to us all coming out of our slumber.

This feral Smurf mostly grunts to communicate because he couldn’t afford a decent education. For similar reasons he swings around trees and lives in caves and wears oak leave bandanas.

The People’s Republic of China (PRC) government method to stop their citizens from exporting their OIC (Often Ill Conceived) wealth was to impose currency controls. Equally, they are keen to show a strong will to stop corruption, motivated by reasons that may paradoxically not necessarily relate to corruption. The PRC has a regulation that prohibits the carrying of cash outside the country amounting to more than US$ 50,000 per person per year. In echoes of a Columbian drug opera, centre stage to the Smurfs. A Smurf is someone who is paid by an Evader to carry up the limit of US$ 50,000 and deposit it in a bank account desired, for example a bank branch in Auckland. By employing 100s of Smurfs (and Smurfettes), large amounts of cash can so be transported from one Evader. How Moving Funds from China to Vancouver Often Mirrors How Columbian Drug Lords Move their Money

Buying a property is a natural part of the scheme to establish a quiet escape, a fall-back position, and to launder the Smurfed dollar bills. If you Smurf enough you might even become an economic immigrant and get some official papers from our government to confirm you are a Kiwi Smurf. Unfortunately, as economists will tell you, inflation is the result of too many Smurfs chasing too few houses.

And this is why, my dear fellow Kiwis, we should be highly concerned and active when we get any Panamanian news. The uncontrolled passage of Smurfs (and Smurfettes) through our airport immigration, to our banks and then into our society means we will soon be living like Wild Smurfs in our own country.

Ferdinand Balfoort with his son Coenraad in front of their ancestral castle

About the author: Ferdinand C Balfoort (MCA,CA,CIA) is an international governance expert with academic and professional expertise and interests in cross cultural impacts of corruption, Smurfs and financial reporting. He has managed numerous forensic investigations, including corruption and fraud reporting. He is known to wear funny hats on occasion.


Recent Activity

Protect our whistleblowers
Transparency International New Zealand (TINZ) is calls for better whistleblower protection. 8 Aug, 2017

Auditor General resignation requires transparency
Transparency International New Zealand (TINZ) calls on Parliament to release the report by Sir Maarten Wevers that lead to the resignation of Auditor-General Martin Matthews. 5 Aug, 2017

TINZ applauds decline in foreign trusts
Government implementation of tougher disclosure requirements for foreign trusts have led to around 75% discontinuing or exiting New Zealand. 9 Jul, 2017

Public Sector Integrity Media Release
State Services Commission took a very positive step in addressing a key recommendation of TINZ's Integrity Plus 2013 New Zealand National Integrity System Assessment by advertising a role for Deputy Commissioner, Integrity, Ethics and Standards. 11 May, 2017

Corruption Perceptions Index 2016 TINZ media release
Transparency International 25 Jan, 2017